Resonsibilities imposed on contractors by Regulation 2 of the Case Study

Resonsibilities imposed on incurors by mandate 2 of the aspect Sites (Safety) Regulations - Case Study ExampleThis research aims to evaluate and present the responsibilities imposed on contractors by Regulation 2 of the winding Sites (Safety) Regulations. Construction is considered amongst one of the most dangerous land based activities in the functional sector of Japan. Although the working population in the turn sector is only about 10%, it stillness accounts for 30% of the work casualties and 40% of the fatalities in Japan. Hong Kong has the highest twirl hazard rates. Falls from height, crashes, excavation accidents, being bumble by an object etc are common social structure hazards. Even after the rate dropped from 350 per 1000 workers in mid 1980 to 60 per 1000 workers in 2007, it still accounted for nearly 20% of all the industrial accidents in Hong Kong. To attain a level of zero fatalities while on construction sites, has been set as a political goal by the governmen t of Japan. Hong Kong has had a very poor safety record. The lack of sensory faculty/low level of education of the construction workers, multi level subcontracting, high mobility of workforce etc can be considered heyday reasons for theses construction hazards amongst others. Even though Hong Kong has passed its own laws and ordinances to help decrease the number of fatal accidents in the construction working sector, it will only have an impact depending on how it is enforced. Mr John Wu, an architect, signed a contract with Hung Ki Dvelopment company to design and develop a 50 storey building. Mr Wu therefore assigned launder Ming Ltd to be the contractor for the detergent builder work, which will take up to 85% of the total contract burden for the formation of the building. Since the scenario doesnt specify, we will make the assumption that the architect John Wu entered a contract with Sunny Construction Ltd, specialist contractors for the building go works. Building servic es engineers are responsible for the design, installation, operation and monitoring of the mechanical, electric and public health systems required for the safe, comfortable and env put rightmentally friendly operation of modern buildings2. Lap Ming Ltd then signed a subcontract with Star Decorator Ltd, also specialist contractors, to complete the internal decorations. The construction work began on 2.10.03 after the application was approved by the building authorities, submitted by Lap Ming. On 1.8.05, the operations of the building works and the internal decorations were in full swing when the foolish behavior of Chan Sam, lead to a fatal accident of a casual worker. Chan Sam, a direct employees of the fire services subcontractor, apply an excavator to move some iron piping to a workplace near the pump theatre on ground floor level. He was being accompanied by a female worker, and in order to entertain her, he drove the excavator in a zigzag manner. Suddenly the iron bars swung out, and fell near a moving lorry, being driven by Mak Sam, who was lowering the tiles inevitable for the internal decorations. The sudden loud noise sent Mak Sam into a shock, causing him to lose his isotropy and accidently push the wrong control lever, which resulted in the crane to move in some other worry and hit the head of a casual worker, Li Yick, who was pronounced dead upon his arrival to the hospital. Both the workers from the builder services (Cham Sam) and the internal decorators (Mak Sam) are directly involved in this accident. According to our assumption, Sunny builder services were hired by the architect John Wu, upon clients request, and the internal decorators Star Ltd entered into a subcontract with Lap Ming Ltd, reservation both John Wu and Lap Ming to be indirectly involved with the accident. Since Hung Ki was assigned to overlook the construction of the building, he is also indirectly involved. Mr John Wu is just an architect by profession, his job is to des ign the