Argumentative Essay In Favor of Euthanasia Essay

Euthanasia is the administration of a lethal agent by other per countersign to a longanimous for the purpose of relieving the patients impossible and incurable suffering. When we talk about euthanasia it is meant as a means to help approximatelyone to achieve a good death. The majority of those who look to euthanasia are terminally ill and do not suck any other options. Either they stay alive and suffer from the severe pain, the symptoms, and the status effects like bedsores, or they decide to turn back their agony and rent the only other alternative. Unlike what few people think, euthanasia is used as a last resort and is only meant for people who face an imminent death. It is not meant to kill, but to help the dying die with dignity. Given that everyone has the secure to die with dignity, as soon as the suffering comes to a last to shorten his or her last days or weeks in order to ratiocination the unbearable pain, the society should accept it and do everything in thei r power to make it possible.Euthanasia is considered accepted among its supporters only if the following ethical guidelines are met. The individual moldiness(prenominal) be an adult in a rational state of mind, whose terminal suffering happens to be unbearable despite the best medical efforts. Secondly, the person must have clearly made a considered decision. As timothy M. Quill illustrates in his essay conclusion and Dignity Diane, a woman diagnosed with terminal leukemia, her husband, and her son talked about her disease and the options including treatment extensively however, She remained very clear about her wish not to undergo chemotherapy and to live whatever time she had left away the hospital. An individual can express his or her preferences about healthcare at the end of life, for example by writing a living will, or even, in todays more open and tolerant society, freely discuss the option of euthanasia with a health-care professional or a family member.Timothy M. Quill notes in the same essay Dianes wish to die, once she lost control of herself and her dignity. She discussed this wish with her family and her doctor and asked them for their help and support. They were not glad about this, but they agreed to respect her choice, and that is what they did. Her doctor had regular meetings with her and talked to her about the philosophy of comfort care, but also about the Hemlock ordination. As her condition worsened, she called up her closest friends including her doctor and said goodbye to them. Two days later sheasked her husband and her son to leave her alone for an time of day after saying goodbye to them. After an hour, they found her dead covered by her favorite shawl. Euthanasia should not be carried out at the firstborn knowledge of a life-threatening nausea, and the individual must seek reasonable medical help to cure or at least slow subdue the progress of the terminal disease.Life is precious and is also worth a fight. Euthanasia is on ly an option when the fight is hopeless and the agony unbearable. However, once the decision is made, the treating physician must be informed and his or her response should be considered. It is always possible, that the diagnosis has been misheard or misunderstood furthermore, the individuals decision could have been triggered by major depression or any other curable mental illness. I think everyone would agree that each physician confronted with a patient seeking help to pull suicide should involve psychiatric consultation in order to rule out major depression before euthanasia should even be considered. After excluding any form of a treatable illness, it should be the physicians choice whether or not to assist the patient to commit suicide.Under normal circumstances we do not have the right to kill or to let someone die, but there are some exceptions to this rule. A physician is permitted to take off treatment and let the patient die, if it is so desired by the patient or a lega l representative. However, if the same person under the same circumstances wishes to be helped directly in order to end his or her suffering, the physician is not allowed to assist this person put an end to his or her life. According to the American Medical Association The physician who performs euthanasia assumes unique responsibility for the act of ending the patients life. On the other hand the AMA also states Physicians have an obligation to relieve pain and suffering and to promote the dignity and autonomy of dying patients in their care.This includes providing effective alleviator treatment even though it may foreseeably hasten death.The above statement shows us that AMA prohibits mobile euthanasia, the administration of a lethal agent by another person to a patient for the purpose of relieving the patients intolerable and incurable suffering., yet allows passive euthanasia, at least in some cases, towithhold treatment and allow a patient to die. James Rachels argues for why physicians should place passive euthanasia in the same category as active euthanasia. First, techniques of passive euthanasia extend the suffering of the patient, because it takes longer to passively allow the patient to die than it would if active measures were taken.Second, Rachels argues that passive euthanasia encourages the physician to make decisions on irrelevant grounds. For example, children born with Downs syndrome often have correctable congenital defects, but sometimes the parents refuse the surgery, because they do not want a child with Downs syndrome therefore, they let the infant die. Rachels example might be a little extreme, but if we really want to be reliable with ourselves, we should recognize that active euthanasia seems to be more humane in some cases than passive euthanasia.Advances in medical technology brought about a identification number of miracles to keep us healthy and to help us live longer however, modern medicine has not entirely solved the proble m of terminal illness and pain. It has even contributed to the complication of the decisions we might be confronted with towards the end of our life, or the life of a loved one. We are going to face life-and-death decisions, we should always choose life over death when life is truly possible, but tragic circumstances can make the afterlife a better life for some people. Euthanasia is an option not a destination. After all No one wants to live to be one hundred, until you ask the man who is ninety-nine.Referencepagehttp//www.starcourse.org/euthanasia.htmhttp//www.togopeacefully.com/http//www.missouri.edu/philwb/Quill.HTMTimothy E. Quill, M.D.Death and DignityA Case of Individualized Decision MakingPrinted in The New England Journal of Medicine,March 7, 1991, Vol. 324, No. 10, pp 691-694.http//www.banned-books.com/truth-seeker/1994archive/121_5/ts215n.htmlDeath and Dignity Making Choices and Taking Charge by Timothy E. Quill. W.W. Norton & Company, New York. 1993The American Medical A ssociationhttp//www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/8458.htmlhttp//www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/8457.htmlhttp//www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/8459.htmlJames Rachels Active and Passive